- Introduction
The official code of conduct and set of journalistic standards is put forth by Editors, Senior Editors, and the Editor in Chief to prioritize journalistic integrity, accuracy, and accountability in all stages of publication. Journalistic guidelines generally apply to writers, editors, and contributors of SPR in order to ensure optimal and fair production. The Stanford Political Review is confident that members and contributors will enthusiastically uphold these guidelines and protect the credibility of the journal.
- Journalistic Integrity
It is of the utmost importance that contributors and editors prioritize journalistic integrity over personal or institutional bias. SPR aims to provide the Stanford community with reliable, high-quality stories and understands that unreliable information undermines the delicate process of political journalism. Above all, SPR seeks to uphold public trust and maintain its reputation as a nonpartisan platform for thoughtful political dialogue.
- Collaboration
SPR values a collaborative and open environment where ideas and creative visions can be shared freely. Constructive dialogue, debate, and critique of ideas are central to the editorial process and to the intellectual mission of the journal. Writers and editors are expected to approach collaboration with respect, professionalism, and humility. Editorial feedback should be viewed as a tool for growth, not criticism. All communication should reflect SPR’s commitment to mutual learning and creative excellence.
- Plagiarism
SPR enforces a zero-tolerance policy toward plagiarism. All work submitted must be the original creation of the author. Quoted material, data, or ideas derived from other sources must be properly cited. Unattributed paraphrasing, the use of AI-generated material without disclosure, or the reuse of one’s own prior work without citation will result in immediate review and the potential removal of published work.
- Respect and Journalistic Etiquette
All members of SPR are expected to uphold a standard of respect in interactions with peers, editors, sources, and the broader community. In interviews and reporting, SPR writers and editors must act with professionalism and sensitivity, especially when covering vulnerable communities.